“Cut your way through these masses like a cannon ball, or steal among them like a plague”
Père Goriot“Cut your way through these masses like a cannon ball, or steal among them like a plague” is Vautrin’s compact image for the struggle to rise in Paris: a young man must break through social competition with conspicuous force or move through it by covert, corrupt means. Recalled by Eugène de Rastignac after a moment of humiliation, the expression links Vautrin’s cynical counsel to the choices Eugène is beginning to face.
Vautrin’s Image of Competition
Vautrin addresses Eugène as a young provincial who has already glimpsed luxury and wants money to enter the world he has seen. He places Eugène among fifty thousand young men seeking rapid fortunes, but warns that there are not enough good positions for them all. The contest, he says, demands desperate effort: rivals must fight and devour one another like spiders in a pot.
The image gives that competition two sharply different modes of action. The cannon ball represents direct, forceful advance through the crowd; the plague represents an insinuating approach that spreads unseen. Vautrin presents neither as a moral ideal. Rather, he pairs the alternatives with his claim that a man succeeds through brilliant genius or skilful corruption, while honesty offers no protection in a society governed by scarcity and rivalry.
The Social World Behind the Metaphor
Vautrin grounds his advice in examples of wealth and respectability that do not align. He describes women spending more than ten thousand francs a year on dress while their husbands earn six thousand, officials buying estates on twelve thousand francs a year, and women sacrificing themselves for the display of a carriage. He also points to Jean-Joachim Goriot, whom he says has had to meet a bill bearing his daughter’s name despite her husband’s income of fifty thousand francs a year.
These examples make the metaphor more than a general call to ambition. In Vautrin’s account, Paris is a network of financial pressures, evasions, and domestic entanglements; he warns that even an apparently simple attraction to a wealthy young woman can stir up a hornet’s nest. His conclusion that an honest man becomes the common enemy explains why the two images are so unsettling: both describe ways of navigating a world where ordinary virtue seems to leave a person exposed.
Eugène’s Recollection
The expression returns in a different circumstance when Eugène seeks help from the Vicomtesse de Beauséant. She initially responds harshly to his request, then relents and invites him to dine with her. Eugène is moved by the change but privately reflects on how quickly even a kind-hearted, high-born woman has set aside her promises of help and treated him as disposable. He asks himself what the rest of the world will be like if this is how one of its kindest women behaves.
As he leaves, Eugène recalls Vautrin’s counsel in a shortened form: “You should cut your way through the world like a cannon ball, as Vautrin said.” The earlier choice between force and stealth has narrowed in his recollection to forceful advance. Yet the scene offers no evidence that Eugène has adopted Vautrin’s full doctrine or acted on it; instead, the remembered phrase registers how a personal slight makes the larger struggle for advancement feel immediate.
Narrative and Thematic Significance
The recurrence gives Vautrin’s language influence beyond the original conversation. His metaphor first frames Paris as a battlefield in which competition can reward genius or corruption; Eugène’s later recollection shows the same language shaping his interpretation of a social encounter. The movement from Vautrin’s broad diagnosis to Eugène’s private reaction turns an abstract account of the city into a pressure on the young man’s conduct.
The paired figures preserve a moral tension rather than resolve it. A cannon ball announces itself through force, while a plague works by insinuation; both imply entry into a crowded system at other people’s expense. Eugène’s recollection shows that Vautrin’s counsel is becoming difficult to dismiss, but the episode leaves open whether he will embrace its methods or merely recognize the harshness of the world they describe.